[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure
From:       Andreas Pakulat <apaku () gmx ! de>
Date:       2015-01-31 21:52:22
Message-ID: CAExHGmQNbFuwtD1nL24H9czi6p_Vnm_jz3f+05S_sSeqxK7ypg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

just a short note (don't want this to become a complete subthread
distracting from the actual proposal-discussion)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org>
wrote:
>
>  that KDE still couldn't agree even on a set of git workflows to use, the
> wiki page still just lists a few proposed drafts. :-/
>

I think thats actually a good thing and would just not work for 'KDE' (i.e.
the whole community with all projects). KDE is just to big and diverse to
impose one particular git workflow onto all its projects, in particular
since some of them also impose certain release management. Different
projects move at different paces, they have different needs for their
release management and the maintainers actually doing the work may have
differing opinions or even just time.

I always found it nice that 'KDE' did not impose too many rules onto its
projects and their developers.

Andreas

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>just a short note (don&#39;t want this to \
become a complete subthread distracting from the actual \
proposal-discussion)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On \
Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:neundorf@kde.org" target="_blank">neundorf@kde.org</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">  that KDE still couldn&#39;t agree even on a set of git \
workflows to use, the<br> wiki page still just lists a few proposed drafts. \
:-/<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think thats actually a good thing and would \
just not work for &#39;KDE&#39; (i.e. the whole community with all projects). KDE is \
just to big and diverse to impose one particular git workflow onto all its projects, \
in particular since some of them also impose certain release management. Different \
projects move at different paces, they have different needs for their release \
management and the maintainers actually doing the work may have differing opinions or \
even just time.</div><div><br></div><div>I always found it nice that &#39;KDE&#39; \
did not impose too many rules onto its projects and their \
developers.</div><div><br></div><div>Andreas</div></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]