[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle
From:       Joseph Crowell <joseph.w.crowell () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-05-04 22:19:19
Message-ID: 5366BCE7.9010004 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

0.0.1 version releases seem to work pretty well for Qt and are released 
as necessary iiuc.

On 5/5/2014 2:36 AM, David Faure wrote:
> [Cross posting against my will...]
>
> On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
>> I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches did
>> not receive the same attention
> This is not the main concern.
>
> My main concern is that application developers prefer to work around bugs in
> KF5 (previously: kdelibs) rather than fix things at the right level, because
> "fixes in KF5 will only be available in 6 months, and I want the bug fixed
> now".
>
> Your suggestion (6-months "stable" release) brings us back to exactly that.
>
> We'd like to try something better. Monthly small increments.
> Never "big" changes that break things, they get cut into small increments too.
> So no reason to buffer changes for 6 months.
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]