[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes
From:       "Dario Freddi" <drf () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-03-19 0:30:44
Message-ID: 20120319003044.13278.20246 () vidsolbach ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

> On March 19, 2012, 12:17 a.m., Henry Miller wrote:
> > In kauth/autotests/HelperTest.cpp The comment on line 57-68 should be r=
eworded. In general when someone is told not to touch some lines they won't=
. You should be clear on why the code is that way.  However saying "you don=
't want to touch this code" is a bad thing.  It gives someone permission to=
 not look close, even when in the future their change would break things.  =
Yes what you are doing is subtle, but that is no excuse for someone to not =
understand it.

Well, the comment was indeed meant to be ironic and funny, and I can indeed=
 rephrase it if it's not desirable. Though, there is all the needed insight=
s into that trick, which is:

      "Qt's local loop optimizations at the moment make it impossible to st=
ream an async request to a process
       living on the same thread. So that's what we do: we instantiate a se=
parate helperProxy and move it to
       a different thread - afterwards we can do everything as if we were i=
n a separate process.

       If you are wondering if this means we'll have two helper proxies, yo=
u are right my friend. But please
       remember that helperProxy acts both as a client and as a server, so =
it makes total sense."

But I can understand if the remaining part does not look appropriate - it's=
 just that I usually don't like reading boring comments ;)


- Dario


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/#review11598
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 18, 2012, 10:25 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote:
> =

> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> =

> (Updated March 18, 2012, 10:25 p.m.)
> =

> =

> Review request for kdelibs, Kevin Ottens, David Faure, and Alexander Neun=
dorf.
> =

> =

> Description
> -------
> =

> Preamble - sorry for having to name-call people but apparently we still d=
on't have a frameworks way for reviewing code (which sucks). And sorry for =
the long summary, but it's worth reading. However.
> =

> This huge patchsets brings KAuth in the marvelous world of Frameworks. If=
 you dislike ReviewBoard's way of displaying diffs or simply want to see a =
commit list, please refer to the URL in "Branch".
> =

> First of all, I pulled in a dependency on KJob after a chat with Kevin. T=
his makes KAuth tier2, but shouldn't be a big issue.
> =

> Then there's the hard part: source compatibility is reasonably broken her=
e. The changes I had to do were mostly for the sake of revamping the intern=
al workflow of the library. The main problem KAuth had was the fact it was =
completely synchronous, leading to a multitude of problems. After these cha=
nges it's fully asynchronous instead (reason for pulling in KJob), the API =
was simplified, and some unused features like multiple action execution hav=
e been removed.
> =

> The main changes at a glance:
> =

>  * Some renaming to the enums
>  * Moving Action & ActionReply to be implicitly shared
>  * Removing ActionWatcher (now useless due to the new semantics of execute
>  * Removing some useless APIs from Action, namely executeActions, execute=
(helper)
>  * execute() now returns a KJob
>  * helperID() -> helperId()
>  * Static action replies are now static accessors returning a new instanc=
e. This was a complete mistake in the first place, but it's still there wit=
h a different semantic to ease porting. The main use case for changing this=
 is a failure to handle implicitly shared classes in multithreaded environm=
ents with that approach.
> =

> Of course, while it would be awesome to have all the code reviewed, I und=
erstand it's a very big change so I'd like at least some feedback on the fo=
llowing points:
> =

>  * General sanity of the new API
>  * Consistency of the enums. StatusInvalid vs. ExecuteMode vs. Authorizat=
ionDeniedError. While the semantic seems correct to me, I'd like to have so=
me feedback on whether consistency is valuable in the ordering of <type><va=
lue> vs. <value><type> and which one should be preferred in case.
>  * Whether to deprecate static accessors such as static const ActionReply=
 SuccessReply(). I strongly favor this.
>  * Whether the new dependency of kcoreaddons for the sake of using KJob i=
s reasonable or I should go for a different alternative.
>  * CMake sanity for the new dependency of kcoreaddons.
> =

> The code is pretty much unit-tested and it should have a decent coverage,=
 even if I had no way to check this. For unit tests, I had to create a fake=
 authorization backend for testing purposes, whereas I managed to reuse the=
 dbus backend for helper communication, so that I could even test that. For=
 running the helper and the client in the same process, in the unit test I =
am resorting to making the dbus service of the helper live in a separate th=
read, to prevent asynchronous DBus calls from failing due to QDBus' local-l=
oop optimization. The test is also run on the session bus.
> =

> =

> Diffs
> -----
> =

>   staging/kauth/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/BackendsManager.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/BackendsManager.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/HelperTest.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/SetupActionTest.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/TestBackend.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/TestBackend.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/TestHelper.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/autotests/TestHelper.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/AuthBackend.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/HelperProxy.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/DBusHelperProxy.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/DBusHelperProxy.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/org.kde.auth.xml PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/fake/FakeBackend.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/fakehelper/FakeHelperProxy.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/fakehelper/FakeHelperProxy.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/mac/AuthServicesBackend.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/policykit/PolicyKitBackend.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/backends/polkit-1/Polkit1Backend.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthaction.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthaction.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthactionreply.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthactionreply.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthactionwatcher.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthactionwatcher.cpp PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthexecutejob.h PRE-CREATION =

>   staging/kauth/src/kauthexecutejob.cpp PRE-CREATION =

> =

> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/diff/
> =

> =

> Testing
> -------
> =

> New unit tests pass 100%
> =

> =

> Thanks,
> =

> Dario Freddi
> =

>


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html>
 <body>
  <div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
   <table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 \
solid;">  <tr>
     <td>
      This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
      <a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/</a>
  </td>
    </tr>
   </table>
   <br />





<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: \
10px;">  <p style="margin-top: 0;">On March 19th, 2012, 12:17 a.m., <b>Henry \
Miller</b> wrote:</p>  <blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid \
#d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">  <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;">In kauth/autotests/HelperTest.cpp The comment on line 57-68 should be \
reworded. In general when someone is told not to touch some lines they won&#39;t. You \
should be clear on why the code is that way.  However saying &quot;you don&#39;t want \
to touch this code&quot; is a bad thing.  It gives someone permission to not look \
close, even when in the future their change would break things.  Yes what you are \
doing is subtle, but that is no excuse for someone to not understand it.</pre>  \
</blockquote>







</blockquote>

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: \
-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Well, the comment was \
indeed meant to be ironic and funny, and I can indeed rephrase it if it&#39;s not \
desirable. Though, there is all the needed insights into that trick, which is:

      &quot;Qt&#39;s local loop optimizations at the moment make it impossible to \
                stream an async request to a process
       living on the same thread. So that&#39;s what we do: we instantiate a separate \
                helperProxy and move it to
       a different thread - afterwards we can do everything as if we were in a \
separate process.

       If you are wondering if this means we&#39;ll have two helper proxies, you are \
                right my friend. But please
       remember that helperProxy acts both as a client and as a server, so it makes \
total sense.&quot;

But I can understand if the remaining part does not look appropriate - it&#39;s just \
that I usually don&#39;t like reading boring comments ;)</pre> <br />








<p>- Dario</p>


<br />
<p>On March 18th, 2012, 10:25 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote:</p>






<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" \
style="background-image: \
url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.png'); \
background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black \
solid;">  <tr>
  <td>

<div>Review request for kdelibs, Kevin Ottens, David Faure, and Alexander \
Neundorf.</div> <div>By Dario Freddi.</div>


<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated March 18, 2012, 10:25 p.m.</i></p>






<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
 <table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" \
style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">  <tr>
  <td>
   <pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;">Preamble - sorry for having to name-call people but apparently we still \
don&#39;t have a frameworks way for reviewing code (which sucks). And sorry for the \
long summary, but it&#39;s worth reading. However.

This huge patchsets brings KAuth in the marvelous world of Frameworks. If you dislike \
ReviewBoard&#39;s way of displaying diffs or simply want to see a commit list, please \
refer to the URL in &quot;Branch&quot;.

First of all, I pulled in a dependency on KJob after a chat with Kevin. This makes \
KAuth tier2, but shouldn&#39;t be a big issue.

Then there&#39;s the hard part: source compatibility is reasonably broken here. The \
changes I had to do were mostly for the sake of revamping the internal workflow of \
the library. The main problem KAuth had was the fact it was completely synchronous, \
leading to a multitude of problems. After these changes it&#39;s fully asynchronous \
instead (reason for pulling in KJob), the API was simplified, and some unused \
features like multiple action execution have been removed.

The main changes at a glance:

 * Some renaming to the enums
 * Moving Action &amp; ActionReply to be implicitly shared
 * Removing ActionWatcher (now useless due to the new semantics of execute
 * Removing some useless APIs from Action, namely executeActions, execute(helper)
 * execute() now returns a KJob
 * helperID() -&gt; helperId()
 * Static action replies are now static accessors returning a new instance. This was \
a complete mistake in the first place, but it&#39;s still there with a different \
semantic to ease porting. The main use case for changing this is a failure to handle \
implicitly shared classes in multithreaded environments with that approach.

Of course, while it would be awesome to have all the code reviewed, I understand \
it&#39;s a very big change so I&#39;d like at least some feedback on the following \
points:

 * General sanity of the new API
 * Consistency of the enums. StatusInvalid vs. ExecuteMode vs. \
AuthorizationDeniedError. While the semantic seems correct to me, I&#39;d like to \
have some feedback on whether consistency is valuable in the ordering of \
&lt;type&gt;&lt;value&gt; vs. &lt;value&gt;&lt;type&gt; and which one should be \
                preferred in case.
 * Whether to deprecate static accessors such as static const ActionReply \
                SuccessReply(). I strongly favor this.
 * Whether the new dependency of kcoreaddons for the sake of using KJob is reasonable \
                or I should go for a different alternative.
 * CMake sanity for the new dependency of kcoreaddons.

The code is pretty much unit-tested and it should have a decent coverage, even if I \
had no way to check this. For unit tests, I had to create a fake authorization \
backend for testing purposes, whereas I managed to reuse the dbus backend for helper \
communication, so that I could even test that. For running the helper and the client \
in the same process, in the unit test I am resorting to making the dbus service of \
the helper live in a separate thread, to prevent asynchronous DBus calls from failing \
due to QDBus&#39; local-loop optimization. The test is also run on the session \
bus.</pre>  </td>
 </tr>
</table>


<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: \
1px solid #b8b5a0">  <tr>
  <td>
   <pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;">New unit tests pass 100%</pre>  </td>
 </tr>
</table>




<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">

 <li>staging/kauth/CMakeLists.txt <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/BackendsManager.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/BackendsManager.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/CMakeLists.txt <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/HelperTest.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/SetupActionTest.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/TestBackend.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/TestBackend.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/TestHelper.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/autotests/TestHelper.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/AuthBackend.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/CMakeLists.txt <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/HelperProxy.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/DBusHelperProxy.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/DBusHelperProxy.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/dbus/org.kde.auth.xml <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/fake/FakeBackend.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/fakehelper/FakeHelperProxy.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/fakehelper/FakeHelperProxy.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/mac/AuthServicesBackend.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/policykit/PolicyKitBackend.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/backends/polkit-1/Polkit1Backend.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthaction.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthaction.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthactionreply.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthactionreply.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthactionwatcher.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthactionwatcher.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthexecutejob.h <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

 <li>staging/kauth/src/kauthexecutejob.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>

</ul>

<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/diff/" style="margin-left: \
3em;">View Diff</a></p>




  </td>
 </tr>
</table>








  </div>
 </body>
</html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic