[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: synching kactivities in kdelibs/4.7
From: Ingo =?utf-8?q?Kl=C3=B6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date: 2011-09-21 19:55:49
Message-ID: 201109212155.58596 () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> Please don't tell me a binary incompatible change in a stable branch
> is seriously being considered.
Well, I guess it depends how you look at it. kactivities is definitely
marked as experimental in kdelibs/4.7. Do we give any guarantees for
experimental libraries? If yes, where? Do we promise that an
experimental library does not change in a BIC way from one minor release
to the next? If yes, where?
Regards,
Ingo
> On 9/21/11, Gorosito Gonzalo <xgonzalo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Just add this to your .kdesrc-buildrc file, right before the
> > kde-workspace module-set:
> >
> > module-set
> >
> > repository kde-projects
> >
> > use-modules kactivities
> >
> > end module-set
> >
> > then ./kdesrc-build kactivities && ./kdesrc-build kde-workspace
> >
> > Enjoy
> > #######################################
> > # Gonzalo Gorosito
> > # Programador && sysadmin
> > #
> > # http://www.tutorialesdebian.com - Tutoriales para debianeros,
> > scripts, info, notícias y mucho mas.
> > # http://www.ggorosito.com.ar - Website personal
> > #######################################
> >
> > 2011/9/21 Rodrigo Belém <rclbelem@gmail.com>:
> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic@kde.org>
wrote:
> >>>>> kdelibs/4.7 shouldn't be used with a separate libkactivities.
> >>>>> This is for 4.8 and further.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe we are supposed to build the rest of KDE (git) against
> >>>> the 4.7 branch of kdelibs now, since master is stale and
> >>>> frozen? Has that changed
> >>>> again?
> >>>
> >>> It seems so... I thought there will be libs 4.8 with just
> >>> bugfixes and stuff.
> >>>
> >>>> distros packaging KDE from git should also package kactivities
> >>>> (in which case
> >>>> kdelibs need fixing to not install the lib), or if we should
> >>>> ignore the separate repo and continue to use the one from
> >>>> kdelibs (in which case kdelibs
> >>>> needs fixing to provide the cmake stuff)?
> >>>
> >>> I'd go for disabling the libkactivities in kdelibs, like it was
> >>> proposed before.
> >>
> >> +1
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic