[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
From:       Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-04-26 7:30:03
Message-ID: 14991243.6pBbD94tRF () doriath
[Download RAW message or body]


On Tuesday, 26 de April de 2011 07:12:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> > 
> > we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> > and
> > kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.
> 
> Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and
> improve it for usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does
> this now imply that that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such
> classes?

No, it implies that if it can be done there, it should be done there.

Kdelibs should be for new functionality that doesn't belong in Qt.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]