[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date: 2011-04-26 7:30:03
Message-ID: 14991243.6pBbD94tRF () doriath
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday, 26 de April de 2011 07:12:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> >
> > we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> > and
> > kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.
>
> Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and
> improve it for usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does
> this now imply that that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such
> classes?
No, it implies that if it can be done there, it should be done there.
Kdelibs should be for new functionality that doesn't belong in Qt.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic