[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: splitting up kdebase in git
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-01-24 20:35:29
Message-ID: 201101241235.30393.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sunday, January 23, 2011, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 6:15:04 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011, Allen Winter wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011 4:34:21 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > hi all ...
> > > > 
> > > > when looking at migrating kdebase to git (thanks to Ian Monroe for
> > > > his efforts there and for the support of KO Gmbh that helped make
> > > > that happen), it was decided to split it up into chunks which are:
> > > > 
> > > > * kdebase runtime (git -> kderuntime)
> > > > * kdebase workspace (git -> kdeworkspace)
> > > 
> > > could we do kde-runtime and kde-workspace instead?
> > > only because it's traditional (and because we already have git
> > > kdepim-runtime)
> > 
> > oops, sorry, probably just my mistake for not including a dash in there
> > .. yeah, that's fine :)
> > 
> > > > * kdebase apps, minus konsole (git -> kdebase-apps)
> > > 
> > > I guess kde-apps won't work.
> > > maybe kde-baseapps?
> > 
> > i like that better, yes..
> 
> Aaron, there is some confusion on the kdebase git rep names.
> 
> We want kde-runtime, kde-workspace, kde-baseapps?
> or do we want to keep the old names (kdebase-runtime, kdebase-workspace,
> kdebase-apps)?

we're dropping "base" from runtime and workspace as it no longer makes sense. 
it's just "kde runtime" and "kde workspace". with this split, "kdebase" 
doesn't make a lot of sense anymore.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]