[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: System Settings categorisation overhaul
From:       Martin =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <ubuntu () martin-graesslin ! com>
Date:       2009-10-03 14:41:43
Message-ID: 200910031641.52381.ubuntu () martin-graesslin ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Am Samstag 03 Oktober 2009 15:37:45 schrieb Darío Andrés:
> As Ben said, the word "Workspace" is a bit "generic"; however I don't
> really know which one to use.
> May be some complete name like "KDE Desktop and Workspace" would make
> sense, however that would include both "look" and "behavior" (and we
> are again in that problem).
I don't think the name is a problem and it shouldn't be a problem. IIRC 
correctly there were some efforts to find an own "brand" for the workspace. So 
needing a name for the category might become a catalyzer to finaly finding a 
name, such as "GNOME Shell" - just better. Personally I wouldn't object to the 
name "Plasma" as the name for Workspace any more as I think that is how it is 
seen by the users: window management is just a part of Plasma.
> 
> Besides that, this "Workspace" item will have too much subitems in its
> "sidebar"; and we are trying to avoid that to reduce scrolling. Too
> bad some settings belong to both worlds... and can't be "splitted"
> properly.
I think we can find a good solution which will suite all the needs. If we 
change, we should change it correctly ;-)

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]