--nextPart3806782.IKvLxLuQgj
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Samstag 03 Oktober 2009 15:37:45 schrieb Dar=EDo Andr=E9s:
> As Ben said, the word "Workspace" is a bit "generic"; however I don't
> really know which one to use.
> May be some complete name like "KDE Desktop and Workspace" would make
> sense, however that would include both "look" and "behavior" (and we
> are again in that problem).
I don't think the name is a problem and it shouldn't be a problem. IIRC=20
correctly there were some efforts to find an own "brand" for the workspace.=
 So=20
needing a name for the category might become a catalyzer to finaly finding =
a=20
name, such as "GNOME Shell" - just better. Personally I wouldn't object to =
the=20
name "Plasma" as the name for Workspace any more as I think that is how it =
is=20
seen by the users: window management is just a part of Plasma.
>=20
> Besides that, this "Workspace" item will have too much subitems in its
> "sidebar"; and we are trying to avoid that to reduce scrolling. Too
> bad some settings belong to both worlds... and can't be "splitted"
> properly.
I think we can find a good solution which will suite all the needs. If we=20
change, we should change it correctly ;-)

--nextPart3806782.IKvLxLuQgj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAAECAAYFAkrHYqgACgkQ/umpWjNT6CLwrAP+L5Wc0l0fI9gfhxfEBoRrVW1s
X7cOu4c8NnS7m4nS1bCeWYj2grdIa7zJ5umymoUQFxrHH84IULxEXiZBwR0GAs2c
moOlN015DZwvnS7k6cJUQf5fTIG6FZiyZCEO2lEk9gffdf+wizWb4QYoP94b7xoF
fYt+BOdqRraHgJDrbJs=
=LPSF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3806782.IKvLxLuQgj--