[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: replacing kcontrol with system settings
From: Benjamin Meyer <ben () meyerhome ! net>
Date: 2007-06-16 22:49:56
Message-ID: 05C1E502-2AC5-402C-81A0-3065F6E4423D () meyerhome ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Jun 16, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>> 2. System settings shows only a partial list of the modules
>> (e.g. the theme manager is missing, which is needed for
>> accessibility)
>
> Arguably the theme manager should be a separate application, but I'm
> happy to include it along with a few changes (removing the links to
> other control modules).
Hmm, I see no reason for it to be include and would not make me happy
if you included it. It should be a separate application. It was not
included in system settings for a good reason and you don't need to
include it because one person noticed it wasn't there and brought it
up, a handful of modules are not there and they were removed for good
reasons. Does it make any sense to have a background module and a
theme module that lets you change the background?
You do one of the following:
- Configure the background/screensaver etc separately and
externally have an application that can download themes install and
configure them.
- Only have the theme manager integrated in kcontrol as the one
method to configure backgrounds etc.
- Have both the separate modules and the theme manager in kcontrol
Putting them both in kcontrol is (and was) just stupid. It just begs
the user question: "Which is the right way to configure my
background?" How would we document that action?
-Benjamin Meyer
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic