[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: New kdelibs policy starting monday
From:       Alexander Neundorf <neundorf () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-07-16 9:12:00
Message-ID: 200607161112.01426.neundorf () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 16 July 2006 10:56, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > I have problems taking you serious as you didn't take part in the initial
> > discussion when I proposed the policy.
>
> Because my contributions to kde are so small I think I should not influence

Well, you are one of only a handful of persons working on bringing KDE to 
windows.

> such a important decisions, so I've not posted to this discussion.
>
> But it totally breaks my idea to introduce a template based pimpl
> replacement.

Why ?
Adding some new class or template doesn't break source or binary compatibility 
(I think).
And you can do it then class-by-class.
Where do you think it can break things ?

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]