[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KProcess overhaul
From: Martijn Klingens <klingens () kde ! org>
Date: 2005-10-10 14:02:21
Message-ID: 200510101602.22027.klingens () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Monday 10 October 2005 14:15, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> hmm, how about that:
> class QAbstractProcess : public QIODevice;
> class QProcess : public QAbstractProcess;
> class KExtProcess : public QAbstractProcess;
>
> i didn't really think it through; it's just an idea. i guess that would
> be qt5 anyway.
Sounds like overkill. If I can make [QK]ExtProcess binary compatible with the
'normal' classes it would be nice, but it's not a goal as it's almost
certainly not even possible. The goal is source compatibility, and possibly
subclassing QIODevice, but subclassing anything below the IO device seems
like a lot of work with little benefit to me.
> > If there's anything interesting or revolutionary, please do inform me.
> > Also I would like to receive a heads-up when you think the K4Process
> > API starts stabilizing,
>
> sure
Thanks!
--
Martijn
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic