[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: SVN timing again
From:       Mirko Boehm <mirko () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-04-10 2:19:20
Message-ID: 200504092219.28023.mirko () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Saturday 09 April 2005 19:59, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:54 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The only thing holding SVN conversion currently is the
> > fact that we can't track reliably server side moves.
> >
> > Me and many others aired the opinion, that we lived
> > so far without tracked server side moves and won't
> > miss it in the future - on the other hand it delays the
> > move to subversion where we can move easily.
> >
> > So my question is: is there demand from kde-core-devel
> > to wait more for Ossi to finish that feature or do you
> > prefer to skip that and go to subversion right away.
> >
> > Ossi is talking about two further weeks and having seen
> > the how long his original week of delay was - nah, let's
> > say we're talking two weeks here. What do you think?
> > Wait or move?
> >
> > Greetings, Stephan
>
> Let's just freakin' move already. people are thinking anoncvs and webcvs
> downtime are related to the svn move, people are tired of being bombarded
> with questions about the move, etc. I just don't think that reliably
> tracking server side moves from the conversion is all that important.

Absolutely on target. 100% history tracking will become less and less 
important with time, so why bother? We will keep a read-only copy of the last 
CVS status around anyway, won't we?

Let's move. 

Best regards,
--Mirko.
-- 
Mirko Boehm <mirko@kde.org>
KDE e.V.: http://www.kde.org/areas/kde-ev

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]