From kde-core-devel  Sun Apr 10 02:19:20 2005
From: Mirko Boehm <mirko () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:19:20 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: SVN timing again
Message-Id: <200504092219.28023.mirko () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=111309962005898
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1954130.YpSK1bXGBC"

--nextPart1954130.YpSK1bXGBC
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 09 April 2005 19:59, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:54 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The only thing holding SVN conversion currently is the
> > fact that we can't track reliably server side moves.
> >
> > Me and many others aired the opinion, that we lived
> > so far without tracked server side moves and won't
> > miss it in the future - on the other hand it delays the
> > move to subversion where we can move easily.
> >
> > So my question is: is there demand from kde-core-devel
> > to wait more for Ossi to finish that feature or do you
> > prefer to skip that and go to subversion right away.
> >
> > Ossi is talking about two further weeks and having seen
> > the how long his original week of delay was - nah, let's
> > say we're talking two weeks here. What do you think?
> > Wait or move?
> >
> > Greetings, Stephan
>
> Let's just freakin' move already. people are thinking anoncvs and webcvs
> downtime are related to the svn move, people are tired of being bombarded
> with questions about the move, etc. I just don't think that reliably
> tracking server side moves from the conversion is all that important.

Absolutely on target. 100% history tracking will become less and less=20
important with time, so why bother? We will keep a read-only copy of the la=
st=20
CVS status around anyway, won't we?

Let's move.=20

Best regards,
=2D-Mirko.
=2D-=20
Mirko Boehm <mirko@kde.org>
KDE e.V.: http://www.kde.org/areas/kde-ev

--nextPart1954130.YpSK1bXGBC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCWI0vYSSaITCTnKURAm7rAJ9LvQSyRT6DhgIWDhV1ub3yptLdagCgkXdZ
cvAw7Si5o2aItxDzqwUCByM=
=6fiI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1954130.YpSK1bXGBC--