[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: [RFC] KMenu tidy up post KDE 3.0
From:       Chris Howells <chrish () gmx ! co ! uk>
Date:       2002-01-21 20:17:36
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 21 January 2002 2:19 pm, aleXXX wrote:

> I very much second that.
> The windows start menu is always at least one level deeper (start-menu ->
> apps -> some group of apps -> search the damn entry which actually starts
> the app and doesn't show me a readme or whatever)
> compared to k-menu -> office -> kword
> Don't let's loose this advantage

> Don't know if it changed with XP, but before that all used the same way.
> The problem is also that each windows app doesn't simply add an entry to
> the start menu, but a whole submenu, containing install and uninstall
> items, readme, stuff, and somewhere the actual app. I don't think this can
> have changed with XP.

Hmm, this is a difficult one. To some extent, I actually like it the MS way :)

> Well, e.g. is Emacs an editor or a development environment ?

Editor :)

Hmm, actually I don't know where it is on the KMenu now since I don't install 
emacs on my systems ... I'll have to check that ;)

> I think menus shouldn't contain more than something like 10 to 15 items.

IMHO that's too long.

- -- 
Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org
Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP key: http://chrishowells.co.uk/pgp.txt
KDE: http://www.koffice.org, http://edu.kde.org, http://usability.kde.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8THdgF8Iu1zN5WiwRAiUOAKCH8MXHLx9jF7T87Nmy1wXMjhi3UQCfWs6S
avdR2FVpMl0IlKbrBnycn0I=
=/Kox
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]