[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Revolutionary Change (kicker)
From: m_elter () t-online ! de (Matthias Elter)
Date: 2001-09-15 11:29:10
[Download RAW message or body]
On Saturday 15 September 2001 04:07, Charles Samuels wrote:
> a) It's obvious the k-menu is copying from microsoft's start button
So what?
> b) wharfs are easily more usuable than that
Please explain.
> c) wharfs (and NeXT's user interface), at least in my opinion, is the
>pinnacle of UI design, it does everything right, at least with their "panel"
>: It puts it on the right-top, it makes the icons larger
Sounds like a matter of taste. My opinion is that 64x64 icons are a waste of
screen space.
> d) starting an app with kicker takes very much siginificantly longer than a
>wharf: (kicker) move mouse, click, move mouse, move mouse, move mouse,
>click;
>(wharf) move mouse, click, move mouse, click
I have panel buttons for all my frequently used apps.
> e) Users have difficulty identifying apps for the first time by icon, all
>wharf buttons can have captions.
A 64 pixel caption? Like "GTV MPEG Pla" in your screenshot?
>f) Users don't know how to delete applets from kicker (RMB sometimes doesn't
>occure to them), with this, they'll arrange it all in an app, including the
>applets.
Did you ever try to remove a Window Maker applet? I find it quite hard to
exactly hit the 2 pixel border.
>g) the API can remain mostly the same as it is now, with nothing more then
>the stuff to allow transparency.
KPanelApplet? No. Look again at the API.
>h) it looks better
Does it?
>i) for those stuck in the past, this can also be put in any location, with
>any orientation, and can be made to look a lot like the current kicker
To be honest, I consider a NextStep like UI "stuck in the past".
>j) it would force us to have better organized menus (they should be shorter,
>with only the most frequently used apps on the menu, and the less frequently
>called things, can be put on a regular menu that shows like in kicker)
Sounds to me like "It's not a bug, it's a feature."
Greetings,
Matthias
P.S.: I don't want to offend you, but why not simply work on Window Maker to
make it 100% NET_WM compliant?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic