[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/kcontrol/kcontrol
From:       Daniel Molkentin <molkentin () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-12-04 17:52:23
Message-ID: 200412041852.24722.molkentin () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 16:17 schrieb Frans Englich:
> On Saturday 04 December 2004 09:33, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > I have to guess y'all didn't read that mail to core-devel... Frans wrote
> > about removing kcmshell from kdebase BUT adding a new version making
> > better use of the KCM code in kdelibs/kutils to kdelibs (which he
> > commited to HEAD before disabling kcmshell in kdebase).

No, and I think I should. I haven't read a mail that mentions this. Please CC 
me the next time.

> > I don't see the problem you're talking about. And if there was
> > miscommunication it probably was that Frans' email was so long that
> > nobody took the time to read it completely ;-)
>
> Damn, I must learn to write better. Other than, is this thread pretty
> amusing :))
>
> Some details, such that it's not mistaken:
>
> * Yes, kcmshell is in kdelibs now, it's not removed. Its behavior is
> backwards compatible, so there should be no problem.

Great. I will try to find some time to look into the changes you did.

> * Daniel, I'm aware of the "no KControl changes before KDE 4" idea and I
> think it's good. KControl haven't been changed in any visible way, and the
> code haven't been touched, except disabling parts. Currently, KControl
> duplicates functionality of kdelibs/kutils, and we can change that in KDE
> 4.

I hope KDE 4 final won't see a KControl as we know it today, depending what 
the output of the KDE KLink Labs (tm) is :)

> If of interest, here it is again(start with a cup of coffee):

Please accept my apology, I wrote my rant without having a coffee first...

Cheers,
  Daniel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]