[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/kcontrol/kdemm (silent)
From:       Matthias Kretz <kretz () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-08-25 20:50:19
Message-ID: 200408252250.23566.kretz () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wednesday 25 August 2004 22:43, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:30, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > CVS commit by mkretz:
> >
> > Directory /home/kde/kdebase/kcontrol/kdemm added to the repository
>
> And here goes another KCM(which will replace another one OTOH). The MM
> framework is by no doubt important, but so is each KCM, and here's a great
> chance to make a conscious design instead of it being a KCM which is the
> "symptoms of an implementation"(not suggestion it will become that).
>
> Here's an idea, Matthias:
> When you've reached an alpha/beta version, write a document which outlines
> the design decisions you've done. For example, /why/ the configuration
> options are there, and why they haven't been done KConfigXT-designer only
> -- why they are needed(we need to keep the count down). Usability folks
> could then flame themselves to death over it :}

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. You think we could get away 
without a KCM (btw, there are more KCMs to come) for kdemm? Without any 
configuration except messing with the config files directly or via KConfigXT 
editor?

-- 
C'ya
        Matthias
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                          <><
http://Vir.homeip.net/
MatthiasKretz@gmx.net, kretz@kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]