--nextPart12018825.Hj0lijkdO1
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 25 August 2004 22:43, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:30, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > CVS commit by mkretz:
> >
> > Directory /home/kde/kdebase/kcontrol/kdemm added to the repository
>
> And here goes another KCM(which will replace another one OTOH). The MM
> framework is by no doubt important, but so is each KCM, and here's a great
> chance to make a conscious design instead of it being a KCM which is the
> "symptoms of an implementation"(not suggestion it will become that).
>
> Here's an idea, Matthias:
> When you've reached an alpha/beta version, write a document which outlines
> the design decisions you've done. For example, /why/ the configuration
> options are there, and why they haven't been done KConfigXT-designer only
> -- why they are needed(we need to keep the count down). Usability folks
> could then flame themselves to death over it :}

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. You think we could get away=20
without a KCM (btw, there are more KCMs to come) for kdemm? Without any=20
configuration except messing with the config files directly or via KConfigX=
T=20
editor?

=2D-=20
C'ya
        Matthias
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                          <><
http://Vir.homeip.net/
MatthiasKretz@gmx.net, kretz@kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

--nextPart12018825.Hj0lijkdO1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBLPuPyg4WnCj6OIoRAmoyAJ9+pvSqDxoDdScSuPSE/FwJ6o8aJACfb/Qe
osraIo9moy6IlywiSRyvKTY=
=+r8S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart12018825.Hj0lijkdO1--