[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdenetwork/kit/icons
From:       Neil Stevens <neil () qualityassistant ! com>
Date:       2002-10-31 12:09:28
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday October 31, 2002 03:50, Antonio Larrosa Jiménez wrote:
> El Jueves, 31 de Octubre de 2002 12:20, Neil Stevens escribió:
> > > >   A            hi16-app-kit.png   1.5
> > > >   A            hi32-app-kit.png   1.5
> > > >   A            hi48-app-kit.png   1.5
> > >
> > > Why do you think we renamed them everywhere else?
> >
> > I didn't remove the cr* versions.
> >
> > > This creates a mess
> >
> > Do enlighten me, please.
>
> cr icons are preferred and will be used when available instead of
> hicolor ones, as you're installing both, the hicolor icons will _never_
> be used. Why installing them then ?

Users *cannot* select highcolor icons anymore?

> Instead, if you install them from the kdeartwork/kdeclassic icon theme,
> then they're nicely used and there's no problem about that.

Why don't "hi" icons now install there?  Can these things please be 
documented somewhere?

> Can I know now why do you want to distribute the hicolor icons as well
> as the crystalsvg icons in your applications ?

Because I disapprove of abandoning the old standards.

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil@qualityassistant.com
"The nearest I can make it out, 'Love your Enemies' means, 'Hate your
Friends'." - Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9wR14f7mnligQOmERAoERAJ47LVrhz7gEXTJR7hehEeI2QhIl3QCgjyKO
RzGW7ZWrnSn1iKM1mUapLlM=
=HA+H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]