[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-buildsystem
Subject:    Re: debugfull
From:       Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2008-08-29 16:28:38
Message-ID: 48B823B6.4070506 () users ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 27.08.08 10:58:25, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 26.08.08 18:32:18, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > > > Forwarding to kde-buildsystem for a more "official" opinion.
> > > And where is the original discussion?
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice/15364
> > 
> > > The bits you posted are pretty meaningless to me, whats the problem?
> > Ah, that debugfull is really slow (due to being completely unoptimized), 
> > and the techbase instructions currently "recommend" it? I was hoping 
> > there was enough context there; /why/ are we using debugfull on 
> > techbase, and is it really a good idea?
> 
> For normal development "Debug" should be used, for just "running" kde4
> RelWithDebInfo should be used. Some time ago we had a discussion here
> about fixing Debugfull for cmake 2.6 and in the course of that I added
> documentation at least in FindKDE4Internal.cmake. I can't remember
> wether I've put up something on the CMake page on techbase...
> 
> Ah, here it is:
> http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/CMake#Command_Line_Variables
> 
> So if the normal "Build KDE4" pages on techbase indicate debugfull that
> should be changed to Debug or RelWithDebInfo - including the first
> sentence above from me.

Ok, see 
http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Getting_Started%2FIncreased_Productivity_in_KDE4_with_Scripts%2F.bashrc&diff=32480&oldid=32090, \
 please change if needed.

-- 
Matthew
This message is non-smoking
_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]