[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-buildsystem
Subject:    Re: debugfull
From:       Andreas Pakulat <apaku () gmx ! de>
Date:       2008-08-29 10:31:46
Message-ID: 20080829103146.GA20964 () morpheus ! apaku ! dnsalias ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 27.08.08 10:58:25, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 26.08.08 18:32:18, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >> Forwarding to kde-buildsystem for a more "official" opinion.
> > 
> > And where is the original discussion?
> 
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice/15364
> 
> > The bits you posted are pretty meaningless to me, whats the problem?
> 
> Ah, that debugfull is really slow (due to being completely unoptimized), 
> and the techbase instructions currently "recommend" it? I was hoping 
> there was enough context there; /why/ are we using debugfull on 
> techbase, and is it really a good idea?

For normal development "Debug" should be used, for just "running" kde4
RelWithDebInfo should be used. Some time ago we had a discussion here
about fixing Debugfull for cmake 2.6 and in the course of that I added
documentation at least in FindKDE4Internal.cmake. I can't remember
wether I've put up something on the CMake page on techbase...

Ah, here it is:
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/CMake#Command_Line_Variables

So if the normal "Build KDE4" pages on techbase indicate debugfull that
should be changed to Debug or RelWithDebInfo - including the first
sentence above from me.

Andreas

-- 
You will be divorced within a year.
_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]