[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-bindings
Subject: Re: PyKF5 bindings generator improvements out for review.
From: Shaheed Haque <srhaque () theiet ! org>
Date: 2017-01-30 22:17:50
Message-ID: CAHAc2jeNG1Tp5-0djC82vmOhXMN07gWpmcAEs5YmgMB44p_Xuw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
I also put out https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/3.
On 29 January 2017 at 21:09, Shaheed Haque <srhaque@theiet.org> wrote:
> OK, let's start small: https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-
> modules/pull/2.
>
> Please review...
>
> On 29 January 2017 at 17:12, Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>>
>> > Rewrite? It think its more a case of forking making things diverge (if
>> you
>> > look, a lot of the changes are formatting, name changes and comments,
>> > though I accept that does make for a lot of noise). I have tried VERY
>> hard
>> > to keep the good changes form both sides...and yes, there ARE a
>> reasonable
>> > number of actual changes too.
>> >
>> > Anyway, I was under the impression a squashed single commit was
>> preferred,
>> > but I can look to pull things out again. I would prefer to work the
>> > reviews via github's Pull Requests, is that still OK?
>>
>> Yep, sounds good to me!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr">I also put out <a \
href="https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/3">https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/3</a>.<br><br></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 January 2017 at 21:09, Shaheed \
Haque <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:srhaque@theiet.org" \
target="_blank">srhaque@theiet.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>OK, let's start small: <a \
href="https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/2" \
target="_blank">https://github.com/<wbr>ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-<wbr>modules/pull/2</a>.<br><br></div>Please \
review...<br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 January 2017 at 17:12, Stephen \
Kelly <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">steveire@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>Shaheed Haque wrote:<br> <br>
> Rewrite? It think its more a case of forking making things diverge (if you<br>
> look, a lot of the changes are formatting, name changes and comments,<br>
> though I accept that does make for a lot of noise). I have tried VERY hard<br>
> to keep the good changes form both sides...and yes, there ARE a reasonable<br>
> number of actual changes too.<br>
><br>
> Anyway, I was under the impression a squashed single commit was preferred,<br>
> but I can look to pull things out again. I would prefer to work the<br>
> reviews via github's Pull Requests, is that still OK?<br>
<br>
</span>Yep, sounds good to me!<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Steve.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic