[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-bindings
Subject: Re: [Kde-bindings] Stability of Qyoto and QyotoDevelop?
From: James Mansion <james () mansionfamily ! plus ! com>
Date: 2010-01-19 20:21:07
Message-ID: 4B561433.5050609 () mansionfamily ! plus ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Richard Dale wrote:
> Well the web site might have been dormant, but we've been working on Qyoto and
> Kimono all the time still.
>
That wasn't obvious, and the initial licensing choice wasn't helpful.
Its a shame.
> I'm thinking on going to FOSDEM - there are lots of Mono talks this year and
> plenty of important developers there. I was hoping more of them would come to
> last year's Akademy, but there were only a couple. I think what we need is to
> have some Qyoto and Kimono downloads on the Mono site, rather than separate
> web sites that aren't very active. So maybe I can sort that out at FOSDEM.
>
I'm sure that would be a big improvement on the current skunkworks
stealth mode. If you could make a
unified MSI with qyoto and qt and put that somewhere and write something
on CodeProject, I'd expect
the result to be quite a lot of interest, too.
The problem with this stuff seems to be that publicity matters. Anyone
heard anything from the Java/Qt
people recently? No, me neither. If you dig you can find commits but
the PR is atrocious. Which is a real
shame given that Nokia seem to be doing great stuff with Qt itself and
their blogs are active. Its just
encouraging, somehow.
James
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic