From kde-bindings  Tue Jan 19 20:21:07 2010
From: James Mansion <james () mansionfamily ! plus ! com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:21:07 +0000
To: kde-bindings
Subject: Re: [Kde-bindings] Stability of Qyoto and QyotoDevelop?
Message-Id: <4B561433.5050609 () mansionfamily ! plus ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-bindings&m=126393250229669

Richard Dale wrote:
> Well the web site might have been dormant, but we've been working on Qyoto and 
> Kimono all the time still.
>   
That wasn't obvious, and the initial licensing choice wasn't helpful.  
Its a shame.
> I'm thinking on going to FOSDEM - there are lots of Mono talks this year and 
> plenty of important developers there. I was hoping more of them would come to 
> last year's Akademy, but there were only a couple. I think what we need is to 
> have some Qyoto and Kimono downloads on the Mono site, rather than separate 
> web sites that aren't very active. So maybe I can sort that out at FOSDEM.
>   
I'm sure that would be a big improvement on the current skunkworks 
stealth mode. If you could make a
unified MSI with qyoto and qt and put that somewhere and write something 
on CodeProject, I'd expect
the result to be quite a lot of interest, too.

The problem with this stuff seems to be that publicity matters.  Anyone 
heard anything from the Java/Qt
people recently?  No, me neither. If you dig you can find commits but 
the PR is atrocious. Which is a real
shame given that Nokia seem to be doing great stuff with Qt itself and 
their blogs are active. Its just
encouraging, somehow.

James


_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings