[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bindings
Subject:    Re: [Kde-bindings] Common work for Qt4 bindings
From:       Marcus <mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com>
Date:       2005-09-10 5:19:33
Message-ID: 200509100019.33529.mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

But I do not know how much of the C++ language moc really understands and how 
much it just skips over. moc's job is to grab the declarations that are 
needed to create .moc files. I do not know how many tricks it uses to do 
that. For example, does moc really understand operator+(...) or does it is 
just smart enough to skip over it?

Another area is enums... It is convenient (for my stuff at least) if I know 
the numbers that are associated with each member of an enum, and I do not 
think that moc provides that.

And then something else that can be useful is that GCCXML knows the size of 
each primitive type (and enum), which can vary across platforms.





I'm unwilling to hack on moc because it is so hard to understand.

On Friday 09 September 2005 11:56 pm, Luca Fascione wrote:
> Hmmm...
> well but wouldn't the source for moc be the natural candidate to look at
> for this task?
> I mean, it's guaranteed to know about what's going on, at least from
> Qt's point of view...
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]