[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-artists
Subject:    Re: Hello, World!
From:       "Jamie Dobbs" <jamie.dobbs () softhome ! net>
Date:       1999-12-18 20:43:55
[Download RAW message or body]

Might as well unsubscribe me as well,  I've been trying to unsubscribe for
several weeks now with no luck.

-----Original Message-----
From: Torsten Rahn <supas121@astrophysik.uni-kiel.de>
To: kde-artists <kde-artists@master.kde.org>
Cc: konold@kde.org <konold@kde.org>
Date: Sunday, December 19, 1999 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Hello, World!


>
>
>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, junky wrote:
>
>> buckle up, this is a ride you cant get off
>>
>> UNSUBSCRIBE ME.. ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!11
>
>Hello junky,
>
>I don't know if the list is weird or if you didn't
>unsubscribe correctly. So if there's something wrong with the
>list I hope that this will get fixed soon.
>
>MARTIN: could you *please* have a look at kde-artist and
>check if it isn't possible to unsubscribe anymore?
>And could you unsubscribe junky, please?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Torsten
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Daniel Bigham" <daniel_bigham@hotmail.com>
>> To: <kde-artists@kde.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 2:17 PM
>> Subject: Hello, World!
>>
>>
>> > Hey guys... I just subscribed to kde-artists@kde.org.
>> >
>> > My name is Daniel Bigham; I'm a 19 year old computer science student at
>> the
>> > University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.
>> >
>> > I've always enjoyed designing icons, so I thought I'd see what I could
do
>> to
>> > help.
>> >
>> > Is there someone who's generally in charge here?  I've looked at past
>> > postings and this mailing list seems a tad dead (Why is that?  No
artists
>> > for KDE?).
>> >
>> > Maybe you guys could tell me who you are or just give me a link to a
>> webpage
>> > that says the equivalent :)
>> >
>> > So is there something I can do to start helping out?  I'm sure there's
>> lots
>> > to do.
>> >
>> > -Daniel
>> >
>> > PS  I don't actually have Linux on my system, which is sort of a
bummer,
>> but
>> > it's not entirely necessary I suppose.  I should have it on fairly
soon.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]