[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-artists
Subject:    [kde-artists] Doubts on Dual Licensing
From:       Tom Schindl <tom.schindl () bestsolution ! at>
Date:       2013-02-06 20:43:43
Message-ID: 5112C07F.6080804 () bestsolution ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

the oxygene site http://www.oxygen-icons.org/ states on
http://www.oxygen-icons.org/?page_id=4 that the icons are dual licensed
under Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Library
General Public License but when I browse your code repository
(http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/) only LGPL is
mentionned there inside COPYING.

My question now is the statement on the oxygene site still true or are
you *not* supporting Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 anymore?

My problem is that I'm not allowed to use LGPL and would be in need for
the Creative Commons option. I'd like to use your icons in an
Eclipse.org project and there LGPL is unfortunately not allowed but
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 would work.

Thanks

Tom

-- 
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl                 geschäftsführer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1   A-6020 innsbruck     fax      ++43 512 935833
http://www.BestSolution.at                      phone    ++43 512 935834
______________________________________________________________________________
kde-artists@kde.org |  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]