[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-artists
Subject:    Re: [kde-artists] Missing Oxygen "view-fit-*" icons
From:       James Richard Tyrer <tyrerj () acm ! org>
Date:       2008-05-12 22:38:18
Message-ID: 4828C6DA.4050602 () acm ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Monday, 12. May 2008, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>> Actually, the magnifier icons are a usability issue.  They need to be
>> clearly visible at +/- 2/10s of an inch screen size.  Most importantly,
>> they need to be visible enough to tell which is which.  This is not the
>> case with the current:
>>
>> 	zoom-fit-best
>> 	zoom-in
>> 	zoom-original
>> 	zoom-out
>>
>> This needs further work.
> 
> Ok, then what about dropping the current zoom-fit-best and using
> the -page fit icons as zoom-fit-{best,width,height} instead?

Actually that is OK with me.  It is what I thought that I originally 
proposed for 'width' and 'height':

	zoom-fit-height
	zoom-fit-width

but my memory has been failing me and I find that although that is what 
I posted to:

http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/icon-naming-spec/to-be-named?action=show

that it doesn't appear on the KDE Artists list because you were already 
up to 4 word titles for them.

However, "zoom-fit-best" is already in the standard and KDE3 has an icon 
for it: "viewmagfit".  So, I called it view_fit_window and I would 
suggest that we continue that with:

	zoom-fit-window

to avoid conflict with the standard.

IAC, I think that:

	zoom-fit-height
	zoom-fit-width
	zoom-fit-window

would be fine.  I think that I did say replace 'view' with 'zoom' and 
the above is what you would get.

-- 
JRT


______________________________________________________________________________
kde-artists@kde.org |  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]