[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-active
Subject:    Re: Proposal: Plasma Active Three end of August
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-09-18 12:04:10
Message-ID: 3688502.joqOAscVgb () freedom
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday, September 14, 2012 22:05:20 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> The blockers definitely have to be fixed before we can release. I would
> definitely not recommend releasing with the major problems still there,
> since it would make us look bad, but they at least leave PA in a usable
> state.

2 bits of input here:

a) we don't need the editorial to convince why we should no release with 
"release blockers". :) Let's all just agree that "release blocker" means what 
it says and then decide on an issue-by-issue basis if that issue is a blocker.

b) these should be in a fresh thread for blockers; i'd like to see such a 
thread on the list at this point in every release cycle so we can collect 
issues for killing in an easy to find spot. i'll send an email shortly.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]