[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kc-kde
Subject:    Re: [kc-kde] CVS?
From:       Juergen Appel <predator1710 () gmx ! de>
Date:       2002-05-15 0:59:26
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2002 00:15 schrieb Rob Kaper:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:30:35PM +0200, Juergen Appel wrote:
> > > > so whats the use then of cvs?
> > >
> > >   That's what I was wondering. :-) I hate to bother David if I'm not
> > > going to use it... IMO, it would seem to me that if it could be worked
> > > out so that each article was a seperate (easy to merge) file that could
> > > be placed in CVS, that would make things easier...
> >
> > I dont know really much about cvs, but as far as im concerned it makes no
> > difference if the editor takes the written articles from the mailing list
> > and merges them, or if he downloads them from cvs. but i just asked coolo
> > for cvs access so i guess we should use it ;-)
>
> The difference is simple:
>
> - editors can now put their stuff directly into the document, the chief
>   editor only has to verify the tags now

announce: ^ thats why we dont need a special directory, as everything that 
gets uploaded is put into one file!

> - all editors can apply typo/URL/markup fixes
> - the templates are a valuable example reference for markup stuff

arnarl just introduced me into the fine art of cvs, i like it :)

> Like I said, I started a new issue in CVS, so let's all find some
> interesting topics to cover!
>
> Rob

_______________________________________________
kc-kde mailing list
kc-kde@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kc-kde
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]