[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kc-kde
Subject:    Re: [kc-kde] CVS?
From:       Rob Kaper <cap () capsi ! com>
Date:       2002-05-14 22:15:37
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:30:35PM +0200, Juergen Appel wrote:
> > > so whats the use then of cvs?
> >
> >   That's what I was wondering. :-) I hate to bother David if I'm not
> > going to use it... IMO, it would seem to me that if it could be worked
> > out so that each article was a seperate (easy to merge) file that could
> > be placed in CVS, that would make things easier...
> 
> I dont know really much about cvs, but as far as im concerned it makes no
> difference if the editor takes the written articles from the mailing list
> and merges them, or if he downloads them from cvs. but i just asked coolo
> for cvs access so i guess we should use it ;-)

The difference is simple:

- editors can now put their stuff directly into the document, the chief
  editor only has to verify the tags now
- all editors can apply typo/URL/markup fixes
- the templates are a valuable example reference for markup stuff

Like I said, I started a new issue in CVS, so let's all find some
interesting topics to cover!

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | Gimme some love, gimme some skin,
cap@capsi.com | if we ain't got that then we ain't got much
www.capsi.com | and we ain't got nothing, nothing! -- "Nothing" by A
_______________________________________________
kc-kde mailing list
kc-kde@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kc-kde
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]