[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: jfs-discussion
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH 26/27] block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni via Jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion () lists ! sourceforge ! net>
Date: 2022-04-15 5:51:29
Message-ID: ad050f78-2d64-0ff9-a6b0-968cfa53eacf () nvidia ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 4/14/22 21:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is
> a data integrity operation vs hint. Fully split the limits and helper
> infrastructure to make the separation more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd]
> Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> [nifs2]
> Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> [f2fs]
> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs]
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
-ck
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic