[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jboss-user
Subject:    [jboss-user] [jBPM Development] New message: "Re: Perhaps a bug in
From:       Maciej Swiderski <do-not-reply () jboss ! com>
Date:       2010-02-28 18:20:29
Message-ID: 170799644.355281267381230415.JavaMail.jboss () clearspace02 ! app ! mwc ! hst ! phx2 ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Perhaps a bug in createHistoryActiv=
ityInstanceQuery when process has a fork":

http://community.jboss.org/message/529025#529025

Author  : Maciej Swiderski
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
=C2=A0
I have encountered similar issue when working on showing history of process=
 instances in console:
http://community.jboss.org/thread/148498
=C2=A0
In addition, execution id was different (process_instance_id.xxx) for task =
nodes as well. I think (as Ronald mentioned on the above discussion - is ju=
st not yet implemented) that there is a lack of one method in HistoryActvit=
yInstanceQuery that will allow querying by processInstanceId instead of onl=
y execution or definition id.
=C2=A0
Perhaps we could file an jira issue and vote for it?!
=C2=A0
Cheers,
Maciej

--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org=
/message/529025#529025




_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic