[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: jboss-user
Subject: [jboss-user] [jBPM Development] New message: "Re: Perhaps a bug in
From: Maciej Swiderski <do-not-reply () jboss ! com>
Date: 2010-02-28 18:20:29
Message-ID: 170799644.355281267381230415.JavaMail.jboss () clearspace02 ! app ! mwc ! hst ! phx2 ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Perhaps a bug in createHistoryActiv=
ityInstanceQuery when process has a fork":
http://community.jboss.org/message/529025#529025
Author : Maciej Swiderski
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
=C2=A0
I have encountered similar issue when working on showing history of process=
instances in console:
http://community.jboss.org/thread/148498
=C2=A0
In addition, execution id was different (process_instance_id.xxx) for task =
nodes as well. I think (as Ronald mentioned on the above discussion - is ju=
st not yet implemented) that there is a lack of one method in HistoryActvit=
yInstanceQuery that will allow querying by processInstanceId instead of onl=
y execution or definition id.
=C2=A0
Perhaps we could file an jira issue and vote for it?!
=C2=A0
Cheers,
Maciej
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org=
/message/529025#529025
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic