[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jboss-user
Subject:    [jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Stateless Process Engine executor
From:       kukeltje <do-not-reply () jboss ! com>
Date:       2007-02-28 21:28:38
Message-ID: 44613.1172698118304.JavaMail.jboss () colo-br-02 ! atl ! jboss ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes, execution of nodes should occur in a context. For that a jBPM context is used. \
It does not mean it has to be the identical, same context. That is why I said you \
have to hold on to a tokenid or  processid to use that to get to the token/process \
when opening a new context. Look at the examples, testcases etc... 

And yes, openening a new context in a new thread should scale (at least I hope \
so).... disabeling real persistency is simple by using an in-memory hsqld database \
and deleting the processinstance once it completes. If you do use a database, tuning \
of indexes etc... should indeed be done. jBPM only delivers minimal tuning..

View the original post : \
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023976#4023976

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023976
 _______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]