[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       hurd-bug
Subject:    Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port()
From:       Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault () gnu ! org>
Date:       2015-11-04 17:57:33
Message-ID: 20151104175733.GA13584 () var ! bordeaux ! inria ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]

Diego Nieto Cid, on Wed 04 Nov 2015 10:50:35 -0300, wrote:
>   assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL)
> 
> AIUI any other values are bogus given how 'mig_get_reply_port' and
> 'mig_dealloc_reply_port' are meant to be paired.

That's probably a good thing to do, yes.

Samuel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]