[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtk-devel
Subject:    Re: GIO API review
From:       Mathias Hasselmann <mathias () taschenorakel ! de>
Date:       2007-12-13 16:58:52
Message-ID: 1197565132.7064.14.camel () localhost
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 17:31 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
>
> typedef enum {
>   G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_FLAGS_NONE = 0,
>   G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS = (1<<0) 
> }
> 
> vs
> 
> typedef enum  {
>   G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_NONE = 0,
>   G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_MONITOR_MOUNTS = (1<<0)
> } GFileMonitorFlags;
> 
> What do people think is the best approach here?

To my knowledge GTK+ would call them:

typedef enum { /*< flags >*/
  G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NONE = 0,
  G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS = (1<<0) 
} GFileQueryInfoFlags;

and

typedef enum { /*< flags >*/
  G_FILE_MONITOR_NONE = 0,
  G_FILE_MONITOR_MONITOR_MOUNTS = (1<<0)
} GFileMonitorFlags;

A problem is the doublicate "monitor", so the second value should be
something like:

  G_FILE_MONITOR_WATCH_MOUNTS


Ciao,
Mathias
-- 
Mathias Hasselmann <mathias@taschenorakel.de>
http://taschenorakel.de/

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]