--===============1745131484== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wm1sjboSb66FiRObbCFx" --=-wm1sjboSb66FiRObbCFx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 17:31 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson: > > typedef enum { > G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_FLAGS_NONE =3D 0, > G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS =3D (1<<0)=20 > } >=20 > vs >=20 > typedef enum { > G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_NONE =3D 0, > G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_MONITOR_MOUNTS =3D (1<<0) > } GFileMonitorFlags; >=20 > What do people think is the best approach here? To my knowledge GTK+ would call them: typedef enum { /*< flags >*/ G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NONE =3D 0, G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS =3D (1<<0)=20 } GFileQueryInfoFlags; and typedef enum { /*< flags >*/ G_FILE_MONITOR_NONE =3D 0, G_FILE_MONITOR_MONITOR_MOUNTS =3D (1<<0) } GFileMonitorFlags; A problem is the doublicate "monitor", so the second value should be something like: G_FILE_MONITOR_WATCH_MOUNTS Ciao, Mathias --=20 Mathias Hasselmann http://taschenorakel.de/ --=-wm1sjboSb66FiRObbCFx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHYWTM73AS0G6kpDQRAvwZAJ4yNjdlmakRAOWOZ45KN1wl/QuB3wCdG4PI T/Vr+VVkmoULD7TLkIlMZsE= =rXt6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wm1sjboSb66FiRObbCFx-- --===============1745131484== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list --===============1745131484==--