[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: NO_SECKEY difference between 2.2 and 2.3
From:       Bernhard Reiter <bernhard () intevation ! de>
Date:       2023-11-22 8:18:11
Message-ID: 202311220918.11512.bernhard () intevation ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Dienstag 21 November 2023 15:28:46 schrieb Aleksander Machniak:
> >> - v2.3 outputs two NO_SECKEY lines referring both recipient's and
> >> sender's keys.

Potentially the sender has encrypted the message for themselves, this would 
explain why there are two potential decryption keys that you both do not 
have. Try an additional -v to see more about the message structure.

Maybe v2.3 is just more informative here.


-- 
https://intevation.de/~bernhard    +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic