[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: NO_SECKEY difference between 2.2 and 2.3
From:       Aleksander Machniak <alec () alec ! pl>
Date:       2023-11-21 14:28:46
Message-ID: af2c91cc-e82f-428e-8e18-23d40bec375e () alec ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

On 21.11.2023 14:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> When I do --decrypt on an encrypted email message (having only
>> recipient's private+public key in the keyring):
>> - v2.2 outputs one NO_SECKEY line referring the recipient's key
> 
> Referring to the recipient's key? I understood that you do have the
> recipient's key but that you lack the sender's key.

Yes, that's right. I don't need a sender's key to decrypt a message.

>> - v2.3 outputs two NO_SECKEY lines referring both recipient's and
>> sender's keys.
>>
>> Is this expected behavior change?
> 
> Maybe not, but 2.3.3 is more than 2 years old. Current is 2.4.3.

That's what I have on Alma Linux 9 by default. I'll take a look for an 
update.

-- 
Aleksander Machniak
Kolab Groupware Developer        [https://kolab.org]
Roundcube Webmail Developer  [https://roundcube.net]
----------------------------------------------------
PGP: 19359DC1 # Blog: https://kolabian.wordpress.com


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]