[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       glibc-alpha
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 2/N] [x86_64] Vectorized math functions
From:       Andrew Senkevich <andrew.n.senkevich () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-12-30 17:39:48
Message-ID: CAMXFM3uEtVbJdsSNjwzp4yDpzgeLjYC4cnZGtgGuQbAUgrZwtg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2014-12-30 20:24 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> 2014-12-30 20:00 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
>> > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2014-12-03 1:41 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
>> >> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Is it OK for trunk?
>> >> >
>> >> > OK once the copyright assignment is in.
>> >>
>> >> Hi, Joseph, is it ok for commit with the following ChangeLog?
>> >
>> > I still don't see the assignment in copyright.list.
>>
>> Yes, there are no assignment in copyright.list but agreement between
>> Intel and FSF was achieved about contribution is possible from anyone
>> having @intel.com email. But may be FSF hasn't signed to formal
>> documents right now.
>>
>> What do you think about it?
>
> As a GNU maintainer of glibc I need to wait for the assignment to appear
> in copyright.list, or for the FSF to notify the GNU maintainers of glibc
> in some other way.

Clear. I hope it will be confirmed before commits closing... Will
check for it after several days...


--
WBR,
Andrew
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]