[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build
From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2017-02-01 14:53:43
Message-ID: 30a34543-9d56-1d4c-ea82-7f6908187168 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]
On 01/02/17 09:43 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:18:42PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>> W dniu 30.01.2017, pon o godzinie 14∶04 -0600, użytkownik William Hubbs
>> napisał:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like
>>> what I
>>> see.
>>>
>>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the
>>> meson build system [3].
>>>
>>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja
>>> as
>>> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where
>>> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability)
>>> outweighs that.
>>>
>>> What do folks think here?
>>
>> On behalf of systemd team, I would like to officially contradict any
>> rumors that those ideas are in any way caused by systemd team. OpenRC
>> developers are shooting their own feet of their own choice.
>
> I don't even know what this is about. I have said nothing about systemd
> or any other package like that.
>
Pre-emptive strike is all. We all know systemd gets blamed for
everything. :D
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic