[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] About validate_desktop_entries in eutils.eclass
From:       Pacho Ramos <pacho () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-04-30 17:50:40
Message-ID: 1335808240.443.4.camel () belkin4
[Download RAW message or body]


El lun, 30-04-2012 a las 10:05 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 04/29/2012 09:45 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > On 15.04.2012 17:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> >>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
> >>> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
> >>>> provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
> >>>> Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? Current way is pretty useless
> >>>> as it's not used by most of packages, and calling it from a lot of
> >>>> eclasses/ebuilds doesn't sound me like a good idea.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> Agreed. It should be in repoman.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The check needs to be run over desktop file going to be installed, not
> >> sure how repoman can handle it, it looked to me more like a emerge job
> >> (like is done with other qa checks run before installation)
> > 
> > There's actually already code in repoman that runs
> > desktop-file-validate. It of course only works for installed packages.
> > Someone could make it run runtime too.
> 
> The repoman code works on $FILESDIR. It looks like we also want to run
> it after src_install.
> 
> Also, it looks like we might need to handle a special case for Konqueror
> Service Menus:
> 
>   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414125

Yes, I would like to also check other desktop files than those coming
from FILESDIR


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]