[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
From:       Mike Frysinger <vapier () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2011-06-28 16:20:57
Message-ID: 201106281220.57634.vapier () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 08:02:03 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote:
> > >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be
> > >> indented? Tabs or n spaces?
> > > 
> > > There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds —
> > > indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in
> > > editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces).
> > 
> > meh ... let devs do whatever they want
> 
> Why? This looks like perfect case to use standard indentation.
> Personally I'd like indentation to be fixed (and I don't really care
> how).

these files are so small/minor, and now we tread into xml territory which has 
much less standardized indenting and line wrapping rules.  it isnt simply a 
matter of "how much space do i put before an open tag".  i really dont see it 
being a "problem" that needs "solving".
-mike

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]