[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's plan to remove .la files:
From:       Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-10-31 21:16:01
Message-ID: 20101031221601.4c7df9ef () ham
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:15:17 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 20.09 +0100, Thomas Beierlein ha
> scritto:
> > 
> > If I read the discussion correctly we will still need to keep
> > these .la
> > files around.
> > 
> Most likely, yes… you can go a bit deeper about them (for instance
> PulseAudio can load its plugins with libltdl even if the .la files are
> not around, and the author _always_ recommended removing them), but
> that's probably something we don't have to care about so much as it
> is.
> 
Anyway, I will look into it and try it out.

> For what concerns the list I provided, that's just the output of the
> tinderbox in the case of hamlib, it was _Hamlib.la that triggered it,
> it is installed in the Python tree and Python does not use .la files.
> 
Ok. Thnaks for the info. Another one will be libhamlib.la as it works
with pkg-config - so no need for it.

Regards,

	Thomas.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzN3JcACgkQQe4uqXYgU9WejwCdFbv1YtXLgunYF0FVXyZWJUmA
2igAn2XloPLjVitP0n0Sh3f9oDi3LOue
=asZZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]