[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb
Subject:    Re: JIT debugging (Attach and speed)
From:       Pedro Alves <palves () redhat ! com>
Date:       2016-03-23 13:31:27
Message-ID: 56F29AAF.5080904 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 03/23/2016 12:24 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 02:18 AM, Yichao Yu wrote:
>
>>> It'd be very nice if we had a _new_ test that covers your use case,
>>> to avoid regressing again.  That likely makes the patch bigger than
>>> what we could accept without a copyright assignment though.  If you'd
>>> like to pursue that, let me know and I'll send you the forms.
>>
>> I've got a simple patch that fixes the issue for me and AFAICT all of
>> the failing tests are racy and/or failing on this machine before the
>> change too. I haven't add test yet since I'm not so sure how to add it
>> (I found test for both jit interface and attach but haven't figured
>> out how to write a new one yet...).
>
> Excellent, this helps a lot.
>
> I have an idea for the test, so I'll handle it.  Let me bundle
> things in a proper patch and post it to gdb-patches.  Stay tuned.

Posted:
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00465.html

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]