[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb
Subject:    Re: JIT debugging (Attach and speed)
From:       Pedro Alves <palves () redhat ! com>
Date:       2016-03-23 12:24:55
Message-ID: 56F28B17.4060508 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 03/23/2016 02:18 AM, Yichao Yu wrote:

>> It'd be very nice if we had a _new_ test that covers your use case,
>> to avoid regressing again.  That likely makes the patch bigger than
>> what we could accept without a copyright assignment though.  If you'd
>> like to pursue that, let me know and I'll send you the forms.
>
> I've got a simple patch that fixes the issue for me and AFAICT all of
> the failing tests are racy and/or failing on this machine before the
> change too. I haven't add test yet since I'm not so sure how to add it
> (I found test for both jit interface and attach but haven't figured
> out how to write a new one yet...).

Excellent, this helps a lot.

I have an idea for the test, so I'll handle it.  Let me bundle
things in a proper patch and post it to gdb-patches.  Stay tuned.

>
> I'm happy to complete copyright related forms necessary.

I'll send this off list.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic