[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gdb
Subject: Re: JIT debugging (Attach and speed)
From: Pedro Alves <palves () redhat ! com>
Date: 2016-03-23 12:24:55
Message-ID: 56F28B17.4060508 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 03/23/2016 02:18 AM, Yichao Yu wrote:
>> It'd be very nice if we had a _new_ test that covers your use case,
>> to avoid regressing again. That likely makes the patch bigger than
>> what we could accept without a copyright assignment though. If you'd
>> like to pursue that, let me know and I'll send you the forms.
>
> I've got a simple patch that fixes the issue for me and AFAICT all of
> the failing tests are racy and/or failing on this machine before the
> change too. I haven't add test yet since I'm not so sure how to add it
> (I found test for both jit interface and attach but haven't figured
> out how to write a new one yet...).
Excellent, this helps a lot.
I have an idea for the test, so I'll handle it. Let me bundle
things in a proper patch and post it to gdb-patches. Stay tuned.
>
> I'm happy to complete copyright related forms necessary.
I'll send this off list.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic