[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Implement -ffortify for C/C++
From: Dirk Mueller <dmuell () gmx ! net>
Date: 2007-01-31 23:34:21
Message-ID: 200702010034.22942.dmuell () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday, 30. January 2007 18:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > so it produces __builtin_object_size(.., 1) if it is a str*/stp* related
> > function and fortify level is > 1. This is how I understood it from
> > reading the glibc header file (I admit it was late and I was drunk).
> Oops, yeah, your patch is correct, I must have missed the bos && there,
> sorry. Still, the *.texi documentation needs fixing to actually describe
> what the option really does.
I agree. Which part do you think is missing? the definition of the parameter
passed down to the builtin_object_size calls in str* functions depending on
the fortify level compared to the mem* functions?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic