From gcc-patches  Wed Jan 31 23:34:21 2007
From: Dirk Mueller <dmuell () gmx ! net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:34:21 +0000
To: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Implement -ffortify for C/C++
Message-Id: <200702010034.22942.dmuell () gmx ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=gcc-patches&m=117028649432116

On Tuesday, 30. January 2007 18:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> > so it produces __builtin_object_size(.., 1) if it is a str*/stp* related
> > function and fortify level is > 1. This is how I understood it from
> > reading the glibc header file (I admit it was late and I was drunk).
> Oops, yeah, your patch is correct, I must have missed the bos && there,
> sorry.  Still, the *.texi documentation needs fixing to actually describe
> what the option really does.

I agree. Which part do you think is missing? the definition of the parameter 
passed down to the builtin_object_size calls in str*  functions depending on 
the fortify level compared to the mem* functions?