[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    What to include in gcc releases. Was: Time schedule?
From:       Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey () switchco ! com>
Date:       1999-10-19 4:00:44
[Download RAW message or body]

This really isn't me throwing gas on a fire (at least not on purpose).
I'm truly ignorant of the situation but it appears to me that the Java
stuff wasn't exactly fitting your description when it was brought in.
Am I wrong or is the pascal stuff really that much worse off?

	later,

		Ben Scherrey

Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> 
>   In message <199910190111.SAA23672@kankakee.wrs.com>you write:
> 
>   > I disagree.  I think we should include it in, now, regardless of the
>   > state it is in.
> I strongly disagree wrong with that attitude.
> 
> There is a significant difference between dropping in something that is
> basically OK and just needs polishing around the edges and dropping in
> something that needs major revamping before it's in the right neighborhood.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]